Upgrade.Vet

AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00629

Original file (PD2012 00629.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: xx BRANCH OF SERVICE: MARINE CORPS
CASE NUMBER: PD1200629 SEPARATION DATE: 20020831

BOARD DATE: 20130821

SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty LCpl/E-3 (0151/Administrative Clerk), medically separated for left knee posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) tear. The CI was a passenger in a motor vehicle accident (MVA) in November 2000. He was wearing his seat belt and sustained an injury to the left knee. The CI was treated with rehabilitation and arthroscopic surgery. The left knee PCL tear condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was placed on limited duty and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The MEB forwarded left knee PCL tear, surgically treated; left knee chondromalacia of the medial femoral condyle, surgically and medically treated; and left knee effusion, medically and surgically treated for Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudication. The PEB adjudicated the left knee PCL tear condition as unfitting, rated 10%, with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.

CI CONTENTION: “I feel the injury was more severe then explained to me. Throughout the years I have always had a stiffness & swelling of my knee. The scar has bothered me also with excessive itching. I now have trouble standing for short periods of time at work & I general. I cannot engage in physical activities for a long period of time. I constantly have knee swelling & stiffness. I go to the VA & complain about my knee locking up & on several occasions I have fallen. My knee is not the same & worsens every year. I have received knee braces & a walking cane from the VA. Now I am starting to have right knee pains & stiffness. My lower back is also another problem I am starting to encounter. I hope to start physical therapy on June 15 2012.”

SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board wishes to clarify that the scope of its review as defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2) is limited to those conditions which were determined by the PEB to be specifically unfitting for continued military service; or, when requested by the CI, those condition(s) “identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB.” The ratings for unfitting conditions will be reviewed in all cases. The other requested condition, lower back, is not within the Board’s purview. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Naval Records.

RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20020627	VA (~6 Mos. Pre-Sep and ~8 Mos Post-Sep) All Effective Date 20020901
Condition	Code	Rating	Condition	Code	Rating	Exam
Left Knee Posterior Cruciate Ligament Tear	5257	10%	Residuals, Posterior Cruciate Ligament Tear, Left Knee s/p Repair	5257	10%	20020225 20030418
↓No Additional MEB/PEB Entries↓	0% X 1 / Not Service-Connected x 7
Combined: 10%	Combined: 10%

ANALYSIS SUMMARY: The Disability Evaluation System (DES) is responsible for maintaining a fit and vital fighting force. While the DES considers all of the member's medical conditions, compensation can only be offered for those medical conditions that cut short a member’s career, and then only to the degree of severity present at the time of final disposition. The DES has neither the role nor the authority to compensate members for anticipated future severity or potential complications of conditions resulting in medical separation nor for conditions determined to be service-connected by the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB. The DVA, operating under a different set of laws (Title 38, United States Code), is empowered to compensate all service-connected conditions and to periodically re-evaluate said conditions for the purpose of adjusting the veteran’s disability rating should the degree of impairment vary over time. The Board’s role is confined to the review of medical records and all evidence at hand to assess the fairness of PEB rating determinations, compared to VASRD standards, based on severity at the time of separation.

Left Knee Posterior Cruciate Ligament Tear Condition. There were three goniometric range-of-motion (ROM) evaluations in evidence, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation; as summarized in the chart below.

invalid font number 31502

Left Knee ROM (Degrees)	VA C&P ~6 Mos. Pre-Sep (20020225)	MEB ~5 Mos. Pre-Sep (20020325)	VA C&P ~8 Mos. Post-Sep (20030418)
Flexion (140 Normal)	140/110	145	140
Extension (0 Normal)	0	-5	0
Comment	Limping gait No instability Painful motion	Symmetric ROM Normal gait 2mm posterior sag (equal to right) Mild laxity = both knees Pseudo Lachman	Symmetric ROM Pain did not limit full ROM Gait normal Mild laxity; not compared to right
§4.71a Rating	10%	10%	10%

The MEB narrative summary (NARSUM) notes the CI’s left knee was injured in a MVA in November 2000 resulting in a PCL tear. Preoperatively the left knee posterior translation was 12 millimeters compared to 3 millimeters in the healthy uninjured right knee (18 May 2001 orthopedic exam). He underwent left knee arthroscopy with PCL reconstruction with patellar tendon graft on 6 July 2001. During arthroscopic examination, the knee was noted to have chondromalacia of the medial joint compartment; otherwise the remainder of the knee was normal. At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) examination on 25 February 2002, performed prior to the MEB orthopedic examination, the CI reported left knee pain, weakness, stiffness and swelling. On examination there was a left leg limp with gait. There was no swelling of the extremities. Left knee ROM had pain beginning at 90 degrees and restricted ROM without pain at 110 degrees. Knee restriction was reported as caused by soft tissue and bony restriction. There was pain with forced extension. There was no ligamentous instability and meniscus tests were negative. At the time of the MEB NARSUM orthopedic examination on 25 March 2002, the CI reported left anteromedial knee pain with 10 minutes of walking and with ascending stairs. He noted occasional swelling and occasional giving way with stairs. There was no catching or locking and muscle strength was noted to have greatly improved since surgery. The CI was unable to run and perform his activities as a marine due to his knee giving way; swelling and anteromedial left knee pain. The MEB physical exam noted a normal gait. There was quadricep muscle atrophy and mild effusion of the left knee. There was no joint line tenderness. The ROM was the same on both knees (hyperextension to -5 degrees and flexion to 145 degrees). There was some mild laxity of both anterior and PCLs of both affected and non-affected knees. The left knee showed 2 millimeters of posterior sag (translation), essentially the same as recorded for the normal right knee in the previous examination cited above. X-rays from October 2001 were noted to show good position of the hardware. At the C&P examination on 18 April 2003, 8 months after separation, the CI reported left knee pain, weakness, stiffness and swelling. He wore a brace when walking long distances or when climbing ladders. On examination the gait was normal. He was able to walk on his toes but not on his heels. ROM was normal and equal in both knees (flexion 140 degrees, extension 0 degrees). There was some crepitus of the left knee and laxity of the anterior cruciate ligament and PCLs. Meniscus tests were negative. X-rays showed chronic postsurgical change.

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB rated the left knee condition 10%, coded 5257. The VA also rated the left knee condition 10%, coded 5257, based on the C&P examinations from February 2002 prior to separation and April 2003 after separation. There was no limitation of motion that supported a minimum rating under VASRD codes for limitation of flexion (5260) or extension (5261). There was no meniscus pathology to warrant consideration under codes for dislocated meniscus (5258) or postoperative meniscus removal (5259). Both the PEB and VA adjudicated a 10% rating using the 5257 code for other knee impairment, recurrent subluxation or lateral instability. The CI did have an injury of the PCL causing instability. Following surgery, the residual laxity of the PCL approximated the healthy right knee. All members agreed the residual laxity did not approach a moderate level and did not exceed the slight level. Orthopedic examiners recorded a similar degree of ligamentous laxity in both knees indicating a normal finding for the CI. The Board concluded the minimal laxity with functional limitation supported the 10% rating adjudicated by the PEB and VA but that dual rating was not supported by the evidence of the record prior to separation. All Board members agreed there was no route to a higher rating. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the left knee condition.

BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. In the matter of the left knee condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.

RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows:

UNFITTING CONDITION	VASRD CODE	RATING
Left Knee Posterior Cruciate Ligament Tear	5257	10%

The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20120608, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record

xx
President
Physical Disability Board of Review

MEMORANDUM FOR DIRECTOR, SECRETARY OF THE NAVY COUNCIL OF REVIEW
BOARDS

Subj: PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW (PDBR) RECOMMENDATIONS

Ref: (a) DoDI 6040.44
(b) CORB ltr dtd 13 Dec 13

In accordance with reference (a), I have reviewed the cases forwarded by reference (b), and, for the reasons provided in their respective forwarding memorandums, approve the recommendations of the PDBR that the following individual’s records not be corrected to reflect a change in either characterization of separation or in the disability rating previously assigned by the Department of the Navy’s Physical Evaluation Board:

- former USMC
- former USN
- former USN

                                                      xx
                                                     Assistant General Counsel
                                                      (Manpower & Reserve Affairs)

Similar Decisions

AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01771

Original file (PD-2014-01771.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

There was pain during evaluation of ROM and stress of the meniscus. The post separation MRI did not report any abnormality of the PCL and orthopedic examination and arthroscopy did not show any abnormality of the PCL.The Board noted the VA C&P examination report of moderate laxity of the medial collateral ligament upon which the VA based its 20% rating under VASRD code 5257. All Board members agreed that the examinations summarized above reported sufficient evidence of painful motion and...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02796

Original file (PD-2013-02796.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

The physical examination noted normal ROM of the left knee, presence of a scar, and a general comment of “Stable.”The final diagnosis was reported as,“Left knee tibial plateau fracture with ligament injury.”At the MEB NARSUM exam on 6 February 2007, the CI was still using crutches in accordance with the post-operative recovery plan for 8 to 12 weeks of limited weight bearing. Although the ACL and PCL were intact, there was evidence of residual laxity at the time of the PT examination and...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-01033

Original file (PD2012-01033.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

Pre-Separation) – All Effective Date 20011208 Condition Code Rating Exam Left, knee arthroscopy; s/p PCL shrinkage 5299-5024 0% X 0 / Not Service-Connected x 0 0% 20011120 20011120 Combined: 0% physical therapy was recommended, however the CI continued to complain of pain and knee instability especially when running. The examiner considered the CI condition as a chronic posterior cruciate ligament deficiency of the left knee. Considering the 5257 code used by the PEB, the Boards noted the...
AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00930

Original file (PD-2014-00930.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Left Knee Pain, Patellofemoral Syndrome, s/p Arthroscopy x25099-500310%Degenerative Arthritis, Left Knee5260-500310%20110803 Internal Derangement, Left Knee5003-525730%20110803Other x0Other x1 RATING: 10%RATING: 40%*Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20120720(most proximate to date of separation [DOS]) Left Knee Pain . After review by a Decision Review Officer, the VA applied two different VASRD codes to the left...
AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00024

Original file (PD-2014-00024.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Left Knee Condition . The Board agreed the left knee condition had someforward laxity but no lateral instability/subluxation after surgery, given the normal gaits, and findings on examinations proximate to...
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00737

Original file (PD2011-00737.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

SUMMARY OF CASE : Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SGT/E-5 (67U20/CH-47 Helicopter Repairman) medically separated for a right knee condition. Right Knee Condition . In the matter of the right knee condition, the Board unanimously recommends a dual coding disability rating for a combined rating of 30%, IAW VASRD §4.71a.
AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00583

Original file (PD2009-00583.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

The MEB found in view of the “osteoarthritis degeneration of the left knee joint” as interfering with duty and forwarded “Bicompartmental Osteoarthritis of the Left Knee, Failed ACL (Anterior Cruciate Ligament) Reconstruction in the Left Knee and Accompanying Anterolateral Rotatory Instability” to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) on the NAVMED 6100/1. Based on the examination results, the examiner opined that the CI had Bicompartmental osteoarthritis of the left knee secondary to the ACL...
AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00812

Original file (PD-2014-00812.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The PEB adjudicated “anterior right knee pain secondary to posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) tear”as unfitting, rated 20%with likely application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The CI made no appealsand was medically separated. The assessment was “a mild Grade 1 tear, possibly Grade 2 at the very worst.” The examiner opined that the CI would benefit from use of a PCL stabilization brace.At the MEB exam on 21...
AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00025

Original file (PD2010-00025.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

Orthopedic exam several weeks later noted a 1+ effusion with a 1+ Lachman test (i.e., positive anterior instability). After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board unanimously recommends a separation rating of 10% for the left knee ACL condition coded 5257 and 10% for the medial meniscus condition coded 5259 for a combined rating of 20%. Subj: PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW (PDBR) RECOMMENDATIONS
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01540

Original file (PD2012 01540.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The VA coded the left knee condition 5257, other impairment of the knee (subluxation or lateral instability) with a 10% rating and separately coded and rated limitation of motion and pain using code 5260, limitation of flexion at 10%. The mild varus instability noted on the C&P performed on 27 September 2006 was not noted on the MEB examination or on the second C&P examination, remote from separation. Physical Disability Board of Review

Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00629

Similar Decisions